These readings are the closest to the sun:
- An Inconvenient Truth about Higher Ed, a review of Ivory Tower.
- The Most Discriminatory Law in the Land.
- The Teaching Class.
- “Being Burmese:” Anti-Muslim Violence and Burma’s Modern-Day Frontiers.
- Face Me I Face You, on Britain and the slave trade.
- The Disruption Machine: What the Gospel of Innovation Gets Wrong:
Christensen has compared the theory of disruptive innovation to a theory of nature: the theory of evolution. But among the many differences between disruption and evolution is that the advocates of disruption have an affinity for circular arguments. If an established company doesn’t disrupt, it will fail, and if it fails it must be because it didn’t disrupt. When a startup fails, that’s a success, since epidemic failure is a hallmark of disruptive innovation. (“Stop being afraid of failure and start embracing it,” the organizers of FailCon, an annual conference, implore, suggesting that, in the era of disruption, innovators face unprecedented challenges. For instance: maybe you made the wrong hires?) When an established company succeeds, that’s only because it hasn’t yet failed. And, when any of these things happen, all of them are only further evidence of disruption.
Disruptive innovation as an explanation for how change happens is everywhere. Ideas that come from business schools are exceptionally well marketed. Faith in disruption is the best illustration, and the worst case, of a larger historical transformation having to do with secularization, and what happens when the invisible hand replaces the hand of God as explanation and justification. Innovation and disruption are ideas that originated in the arena of business but which have since been applied to arenas whose values and goals are remote from the values and goals of business. People aren’t disk drives. Public schools, colleges and universities, churches, museums, and many hospitals, all of which have been subjected to disruptive innovation, have revenues and expenses and infrastructures, but they aren’t industries in the same way that manufacturers of hard-disk drives or truck engines or drygoods are industries. Journalism isn’t an industry in that sense, either.
- Smith College’s Pronoun Problem.
- The Kenyan Government’s “economic war on the people of Eastleigh.”
- On Expertise and the Public Intellectual.
- Is the News about Congo’s Conflict Minerals Good?
- How Cities Use Design to Keep Homeless People Away.
- Prison Labor’s New Frontier: Artisanal Foods:
Prison labor has gone artisanal. Sure, plenty of inmates still churn out government office furniture and the like, and incarcerated workers have occasionally been used by large companies since the late 1970s. Nationwide 63,032 inmates produce more than $2 billion worth of products a year, most of them sold to government entities.
But in recent years a new wave has begun, driven primarily by small businesses that need workers for boutique-size production. These days inmates can be found making everything from redwood canoes to specialty motorcycles, fishing poles, and saddles. They produce apple juice, raise tilapia, milk cows and goats, grow flowers, and manage vineyards.
- Rethinking Security in Kenya.
- Conflict from Below in Eastern Congo.
- How ISIS Games Twitter.
- Four Professors’ Clever Stunt Sheds Light on Administrative-Academic Pay Gap.
- Why the “End Demand” Approach to Sex Work Doesn’t Work.
- “Game of Thrones” Fails the Female Gaze.